Monday, June 3, 2013

Tony Stewart wins at Dover


Tony Stewart won the FedEx 400 yesterday at Dover. It's Stewart's first win of the season and frankly, the only time he's come close to sniffing a win all season.

With Jimmie Johnson jumping the last re-start and being penalized by NASCAR, it was Stewart and Juan Pablo Montoya going for the win on the last couple of laps. Heading into the turn the guys were door to door and in that circumstance, with the win on the line, you knew the one guy who wouldn't lift.

Always nice to see Montoya doing well. I've got a soft spot for the open wheel guys who come into NASCAR. It would be nice to see him and Chip Ganassi do well this season.

When this race started, I was thinking about writing something about what was wrong at Stewart-Haas racing this year. With the exception of Ryan Newman, who quietly creeps up towards the top ten each race, the guys and Danica have been dead slow all season. They simply do not seem to have these Gen 6 cars figured out.

You know it's got to be frustrating for them all. You saw that in the race when Newman got tired of Gilleland blocking him and basically pushed him out of the way and ended up wrecking them both. You also saw Danica pounding her steering wheel in the garage after she finally got racey enough to get into the top ten a few weeks back only to get collected in a wreck. That's a driven (no pun intended) group and the lack of results on the track has got to be aggravating.

I wouldn't suspect that Rick Hendrick is giving Stewart-Haas anything less than the best equipment to work with, but still . . . after watching Tony beat them with his own stuff, you've got to wonder. I've played enough city league ball to know that when you're going to forfeit because you don't have enough guys, the other team doesn't loan you their biggest and baddest player to fill out your roster. You get the guy who only comes in for the bottom of the inning to stand in right field when the game is going to get 10 runned.

Just sayin' . . .

I also saw in the post race news that Kesolewski's car got impounded after the race for failing inspection. Again?! Paul Wolfe's first race back and this happens?! I know these guys push the envelope every race, but I cannot imagine they were trying to sneak something by. Have to wait and see.

But for now, it's congrats Tony! And hopefully it is the start of these guys getting things together over there.

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Movie review -- Detective Dee and the Mystery of the Phantom Flame


I came across this flick a little while back and was intrigued by the title. I'm glad I decided to watch it all the way through.

The year is 689 A.D. and with the previous Emperor dead, China is being ruled by a Regent - Wu Zetian. China has prospered under her rule, though the patriarchal/monarchical society isn't keen about an Empress on a full-time basis. Convinced she has heaven's mandate to ascend the throne, Wu doesn't hesitate to remove anyone who objects to her rise. Making use of everything and everyone at her disposal, including the mysterious Imperial Chaplain, rebels and dissidents are jailed or killed.

To celebrate her coronation, a huge buddha is being constructed outside the Imperial Palace opposite the coronation stage. But there is unrest amongst the workers. The central core of the buddha is covered with amulets supplied by the Imperial Chaplain to ward off evil spirits. An inspector, Jia Yi, has moved one of the amulets during his inspection and forgotten to replace it. The workers assume something evil will befall them or the project. Before the Inspector can replace the amulet, he bursts into flame while conducting a tour of the buddha with visiting dignitaries.

An official from the Supreme Court is sent to investigate. The official, Master Xue, believes the inspector was poisoned with phosphorus. His junior, Pei Donglai disagrees thinking there may be something to the construction superintendent's claim of divine intervention. Xue scoffs at that notion and rips the amulet off the column, daring the gods to strike him down. When they ride to share their conclusions with the soon-to-be Empress, who is enjoying a military tribute, Xue bursts into flame on the parade grounds in front of everyone.

Unsure of exactly who is trying to ruin her coronation, Wu is visited by the Imperial Chaplain's magic deer (yeah, I actually wrote that), who via a cryptic speech implies that only the imprisoned Detective Dee can solve the case.

Dee has been languishing in prison for eight years for opposing Wu Zetian's regency. She has him released from prison and placed at the head of the Supreme Court as Imperial Commissioner with his task to solve the mystery of the phantom flame. Zetian assigns two others to assist him in his investigation -- Jing'er Shangguan, played by Li Bing Bing is an official of the Palace and a possible lover/consort to Wu. Pei Donglai, played by Deng Chao, is a member of the Supreme Court and is also an albino (not sure why exactly, but whatever...).

Plenty of familiar faces in this movie. Dee is played by the wonderful Andy Lau, whom I recognized from The House of Flying Daggers as the tortured lover of Mei. Li Bing Bing appeared in Resident Evil: Retribution as the back-stabbing spy Ada Wong. Also, the buddha's construction supervisor, Shatuo Zhong played by Tony Leung can be seen in another of my favorite's -- Bodyguards and Assassins.

I was tempted to refer to this as a "little" film in the opening, but the movie has a huge budget. Most of the sets are massive and intricately designed and detailed. The palace, the various homes and villages, Infinity Monastery -- all look beautiful and colorful. The costumes are extravagant period looks, I especially got a kick out of the over-the-top hairdos and head adornments worn by Wu Zetian. Fabulous! And the CGI, whether the cityscape vistas or the inside of the buddha or any of the special effects -- well done and unobtrusive. They dropped some serious coin on this flick. Plus it is directed by Tsui Hark and has Sammo Hung doing the action scenes, so some nice pedigree at work here as well.

Dee's relationship with the various characters gives the film some added depth. When Dee and the Empress meet following his release from prison, their interaction shows that they clearly know each other quite well from before. The way she hands him his badge of authority -- is that some slight passion there or just part of Wu's clever manipulation? With both Jing'er and Pei, Dee doesn't hesitate to tweak their arrogant behaviour all while teaching and protecting them. On mulitple occassions, Dee warns Jing'er that Wu's intense suspiciousness and relentless drive to ascend the throne will cause her to sacrifice anyone to achieve her goal.

It becomes obvious that Dee and Jing'er are attracted to one another, though Jing'er's ultimate devotion is to Wu. Pei seems both protective of, and in competition with and/or suspicious of, Jing'er. The protective bit seems odd as she is, herself, a talented fighter armed with a long whip and a sword. Pei too, is walking armory, carrying a sword and a double-bladed short axe, plus an odd helicopter dart thingy and exploding smoke bombs.

Dee's weapon is something he refers to as his "Dragon Taming Mace" a gift from the previous Emperor. The mace is a pretty cool weapon -- iron (I'm assuming), with a spinning band that when rubbed against an opponent's weapon will tell the wielder where the other weapon has a crack. Thus Dee can destroy any sword by striking where the crack has been revealed. This also leads to a delightful quote from the film. When the Empress asks Dee to tell her why the mace is so special, he demonstrates by destroying a stone column. Wu looks slyly at Dee and tells him that men also have weak points and will break when struck. heh

But here's where I, as a westerner, have some trouble with Asian mythology and traditions (I also have trouble with which name to put first, so if I'm messing up the names here, I apologize). Anyway, when the Emperor bestows the Mace on Dee, he tells him that if he (the Emperor) ever errs in his rule, Dee should counsel him before the mace.

?!?!

And on two other occasions, Dee asks the Empress questions while holding the mace before her, as though she dare not lie in its presence. I'm not complaining, I'm just having a hard time drawing a correlation with something in my frame of reference. Swearing on the Bible, maybe? Who knows?

The story isn't hard to follow, though reading the sub-titles can slow you down a bit and requires multiple viewings to get all the details. At least it did for me, but you know -- concussion. Dee is a masterful fighter and a good detective and pieces things together along with some of the concurrent sub-plots without making it seem leapy. The case is solved eventually. I did not guess in advance who the baddie was, so that's kind of cool. The movie has nice pacing. There are some great fight scenes, a little wire-fu but not so much as to overwhelm things. Some subtle humor, plus the usual nobility and self-sacrifice you see in these new China flicks.

I have the DVD of this film and have watched the English-dubbed version and the Mandarin with English subtitles and find the latter to be the superior choice. Clearly the same people who did the subtitles are not the people who did the dubbing as they are distinctly different. And I like the flavor of the subtitles. A good example is when they are speaking of the Phantom Bazaar. In the subtitles the place is described by Pei as a "spooky pandemonium" while in the dubbed version, Pei calls it a "dirty slum." I don't know about you, but spooky pandemonium gets my vote every time.

All in all, this movie is a fun watch and easy to sit through multiple viewings. No nudity or sex, a little bloody (I think it is rated PG-13), but none of the over-the-top gushing geysers from the chop-socky type action movies. I highly recommend it.


Did you find this review helpful? Check out my other reviews for my thoughts on the flicks and the occasional gallery of hotness that accompanies them:



Monday, May 27, 2013

Happy Memorial Day!


My father served in the Navy in World War II, my son served two tours of Iraq -- one with the Marines and one with the Army. By the grace of God, both returned home alive. I won't say safely, as my father brought home demons from his experiences that he battled for the rest of his days. I can only hope my son is spared those trials in his life.

But a great many other men, and women, did not return home, having given their lives in service to their, and our, country. This day is set aside to honor them and their sacrifice.

So take a moment amidst the races and barbeques and beach goings and such to say thanks to those who gave everything so that we may enjoy the little things in our lives.

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Congrats to Tony Kanaan for winning Indy

Tony Kanaan won the Indy 500 today. Tony's one of those feel-good stories, a really decent guy, good driver, etc., who lost his drive at Andretti Green when his car lost its sponsorship a year or two ago. He's been bangin' around trying to stay relevant in the sport ever since.

Kanaan won the race under a yellow flag that had the cars on the last two laps zooming around the track at a whopping 60mph. I'm not a big fan of yellow flag finishes -- they rank with rain stoppages with me as the most undeserving of wins. But everyone's happy for Tony, most likely his son, who they mentioned in an interview was hoping Tony would come back home if he won today. We'll see.

The race itself wasn't too bad. Sadly, I've drifted away from open wheel motorsports of late because of the IROC-ization of IndyCar. The crate motors, single chassis manufacturer, the gimmicky stuff -- push-to-pass, different tires and restrictions on when you can change them, etc.

But IndyCar seems to be learning. The new body design allows for actual drafting (something NASCAR should take note of), and they've allowed Chevy to offer motors as well as allowing at least two different chassis mfgs. So it has opened things up enough that this long time race fan may come back to one of his favorite styles of racing for the balance of the year.

The announcing wasn't too bad. I've mentioned before that I like Eddie Cheever since he seems unafraid to speak his mind even if it isn't politically correct for the sport (see his comments when Dan Wheldon died on the track). They had one noticible bobble during the race as a car wrecked early -- Sebastian Saavedra, he could be heard on his radio saying someone deserved a penalty for what happened. Replays clearly showed another car sliding down the track and hitting Saavedra, spinning him into the wall and putting him out of the race. Despite the announcers saying they would find out what car that was, they never did. Or at least they never announced who it was. Why? Who knows, but it was disappointing to this fan not to get the story.

That's sort of the announcer's job, right?

Anyway, hat tip to Tony and later today is the Coke 600. Hopefully someone other than Jimmie Johnson will win, and I'll end up having a nice holiday weekend.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Congrats to Matt Moore

Congratulations to Rays pitcher Matt Moore who became the first left handed pitcher in over 15 years to start a season 8-0 with a 3-1 victory over the Orioles yesterday.

You've got to hand it to the guys in the Rays scouting department. When it comes to finding stud pitchers, these dudes have got it all figured out. They seem to have an endless stream of hot pitchers coming through the system. I can't think of another team in baseball that seems so pitching rich, at least with their starters, as the Rays.

The Rays 3 game win streak has them tied with Baltimore for third place and four games out of first. The Sox, who won their fifth straight yesterday, are still in second, a half game out -- yay!

But anyway, hat tip to Matt for a pretty nice start to this season. And by the way, here's Miley making a one-piece look pretty good:

miley cyrus one-piece cleavagey

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Sometimes when I read the paper . . .

Reading the Tampa Bay (formerly the St. Pete) Times can be a brutal experience for a conservative. This Sunday's edition, in the editorial pages at least, was no exception.

One article and one editorial about the horrific threat of climate change set the tone. The first from Edward Renner a professor in the Honors college at USF, starts off with a complete falsehood -- "New measurements show that the climate-changing gas carbon dioxide is at the highest atmospheric concentrations...in at least 3 million years."

A peer reviewed study was released only this year showing that CO2 levels reached as high as 435ppm a mere 12,000 years ago. That's a far cry from 3 million years! At many other times in our geological history, CO2 levels have been as high as 1000ppm and life has gone on, plants and animals have thrived. Studies indicate we are, if anything, in a CO2 drought at the moment.

The Times itself doubles down on this with its usual climate hysteria pointing out a CIA (of all people!) report issuing "...a warning that the acceleration of climate change will spark conflicts and human migration of such magnitude that it will strain the American military."

Seriously?!?!

Setting aside the fact that the CIA isn't exactly an expert on global science, the problem with all this is that we are currently in a period of global cooling right now. In fact, planet temperatures have risen only 4 tenths of a degree celsius since the mid-70's.


In point of fact, there is still no conclusive data to suggest that CO2 has any specific re-radiative properties that would contribute to global warming or the so-called greenhouse effect. In fact, studies show we have experienced ice ages with CO2 levels as high as 2000ppm.

The Times also trots out their favorite scare tactic -- rising oceans. Problem with that is that studies show that the figure used by the IPCC and other climate hysterics is 70% higher than the actual figure. The Journal of Geophysical Research -- Solid Earth finds that the actual figure for estimated sea level rise averaged from 2003 to 2012 is .16mm/yr. Extrapolate that figure out to the year 2100 and you have a sea level rise of 1/2 inch! That's hardly flooding of biblical proportions!

But climate astrologists like those at the Times continue their hysterical claims that we must turn ourselves backward to the days of horse drawn carriages to save the world from some imaginary impending disaster. And despite being proven wrong on every single prediction since Al Gore's faux science has lined his pockets with millions of dollars, the so-called purveyors of truth at the Times continues to publish this nonsense on a daily basis.

Also in the editorial section was a disturbing piece by columnist Robyn Blumner. In the wake of Angelina Jolie's revelation of her double mastectomy to protect herself from what she believed was an 80% chance of breast cancer in the future, Ms. Blumner admits she has had the same thing done.

Ms. Blumner states that in 2011 doctors found a small cancer (technically a "stage zero" DCIS), and though there was no cancer history in her family she went ahead with the procedure because of . . .

"...the single minded obsession Republicans have with repealing the Affordable Care Act."

?!?!

That's right . . . Ms. Blumner mutilated herself over a political difference of opinion! Now last I looked, Ms. Blumner is employed by the paper and probably makes somewhere close to the mid $50's. Are you telling me the Tampa Bay Times doesn't offer health care to its employees?! Where are the articles excoriating them on that? I haven't seen any. And if that's the case, why hasn't Ms. Blumner sought out one of the many personal health care plans that a person of her means could easily afford?

Because Ms. Blumner is a died-in-the-wool nanny state liberal who thinks that your tax dollars should pay for her medical costs even when she could manage them herself. She states that her double mastectomy saves her the future costs of mammograms (which are affordably offered by the baby slaughtering Planned Parenthood last I looked) and saves her from bankruptcy even though she admits the possibility of that is slight.

She closes her article with this insane statement -- "With Republicans in Congress waiting for their opportunity to kill off my medical and financial security, I simply couldn't risk keeping my breasts."

OMG! I simply don't know how to respond to someone so deranged that they do something like this. All I can say is that I pity you Ms. Blumner, I'm sorry you've let a simple political disagreement drive you to self-mutilation and I worry about your mental health in the future. This is the sort of hyper-overreaction to politics or idealogy that drives someone to do what happened in Boston earlier this year. If the sanctity of your own body means so little to you, what might you be capable of should conservatives gain control of Congress and/or the White House in the future? I shudder at the possibilities.

My God! What is wrong with liberals anymore?!


And on a lighter note, here's some tree hugging I can actually get behind:

ella modelella modelella model

Friday, May 17, 2013

Not only a teacher, but . . .

. . . a budding entrepreneur as well.

Olivia Sprauer, the high school english teacher who was recently fired for having done some fairly racing modeling to pay for her grad school, looks to be capitalizing on her 15 minutes of fame.

Ms. Sprauer, who models under the name of Victoria V. James (the V is for Valentine . . . heh), has acquired a domain name and will soon be launching her own website -- missvictoriajames.com

Given some of the saucy work she's done in her brief career so far, I'm thinking her own site (probably pay or with a member's section) might be pretty interesting:

olivia sprauer aka victoria v. james

olivia sprauer aka victoria v. james

olivia sprauer aka victoria v. james

And these liberal/socialists say capitalism is evil . . . bah!



Need more Victoria James hotness? Try these:

It turns out Olivia Sprauer has beenmoonlighting as a saucy model.

Victoria V. James did Hustler after all.