Wednesday, September 21, 2011

And while I'm on a video kick . . .

Here is Rick Perry's first campaign commercial -- sort of a "I'm here to kick ass and chew gum . . . and I'm all out of gum!" beginning to his campaign:


It's pretty slickly produced and without setting specifics, is a nice introduction for the Gov. I see some bloggers are griping about the lack of stats and plans in the ad, but it's only his opening salvo and he's showing that, at least at the outset, his plans are to highlight this administration's awful jobs and economic record.

And away we go . . .

Best explanation yet

The Jewish/Palestinian conflict and history explained in 11:37

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Where's PolitiFact on this one?

So I ran out this morning . . . okay, actually I didn't run, that's the problem with bad knees, but I popped out to get a copy of the local mullet wrapper -- St. Pete Times, because I knew their vaunted PolitiFact would be all over the President's whoppers in his speech yesterday morning.

So with the economy in the tank, unemployment rising, the nation looking for leadership, what does PolitiFact check -- Michele Bachmann's anecdote about Gardasil!

Barack Obama has literally made his career on straw man arguments, and lately, with bald-faced lies and distortions. His comments vis a vis his new Buffett tax are only the latest. But they are the easiest to debunk.

Though he shrieks the mantra "pay their fair share" like Al Gore on crack, when demonizing the job creators in this country, the facts simply don't back him up. IRS data shows that the top 1% of wage earners, those with adjusted gross incomes exceeding $380K, already pay over 38% of all income tax collected each year. Additionally, 46% of households (the low and middle income families) will pay no income tax at all this year.

So who's not paying their fair share Mr. President?

The President's comments about millionaires paying less taxes than their secretaries is so absurd, it should serve as a litmus test for anyone wanting to vote in the next election -- if you believe the Prez' statement, you aren't smart enough to vote!

Households with earnings over $1 million will pay 29.1% of their income in federal taxes, households making between $50,000 and $75,000 will pay 15%, those making between $40,000 and $50,000 will pay 12.5%, and finally those making $20,000 and $30,000 will pay 5.7 percent. Now the President says it's not class warfare but math. Well the math looks pretty obvious to me.

The only good thing to come out of this election speech, and that's what it was as he still has not submitted a single piece of actual legislation going all the way back to his joke of a jobs bill, is that even left wing publications are pointing out the blatant falsehoods in the President's speech.

Except the St. Pete Times of course, they're so in the tank for the President they're burying stories like the Solyndra scandal deep in the paper while they put every story about the Tea Party or the Republican candidates on the front page.

My bet is that when PolitiFact finally addresses this situation, they'll use the same thing they've done in the past to protect liberal politicians -- cherry pick the data to support their biased agenda.

Pitiful.

Congrats to Tony Stewart


Tony Stewart won the rain delayed Geico 400 yesterday to move himself into second place in NASCAR's chase for the championship.

Playing the gas mileage game, Tony finished just ahead of Kevin Harvick who moved into first place in the chase. After gambling like this last year and running out of gas to derail his championship hopes, this had to feel like a bit of redemption for Tony.

Also a bit of redemption for Dale Earnhart Jr. as he too played the mileage game and finished third moving up in the Chase standings as well. Jr. has been much maligned and perhaps justifiably so this season for not performing up to expectations. His old crew chief has Jeff Gordon as one of the favorites to win the Chase, while Gordon's old crew chief can't seem to get much out of Dale Jr.

I'm getting a little tired of all these races being run on Mondays and Tuesdays this season. Don't know if it's a fluke or the fact that with so many races being run up north, the weather's more of a factor or what. But with attendance down, this kind of stuff isn't helping the sport out much.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Sports and such

The Rays beat Boston 8-5 to cut the Sox's wild card lead to 2 games. Tampa Bay has 7 games left against the Yankees and 3 against Toronto. The Sox have 7 against the Orioles and 3 against the Yankees. New York has to play tough to keep their division lead intact and both the Jays and the O's got nothing to lose, so both teams have an uphill battle ahead of them. Boston has the worst or next to worst record in the majors this month. They need to get their stuff wired or they'll be sitting at home watching someone else play in October.

The Bucs beat the Vikings 24-20, which means I won the office pool (woot!). It would seem Tampa's working on last year's plan -- sort of a football version of the rope-a-dope, where they just hang around for the first half getting pummeled, then turn it on for a dramatic comeback. I think Minnesota out-gained them 270 to 60 yards in the first half (or something close to that), and the Bucs were down 17-0 before starting their comeback. Like I said before, I don't agree with how they are running this team and I don't understand how they're successful, but something's working. Yippee, I guess.

NASCAR got rained out -- again. So no race until Monday or Tuesday -- again. Is this the most rainouts in a season or what?

Floyd Mayweather won his title fight by cheap-shotting Victor Ortiz on a break. Then he proceeded to talk smack to 80+ year old Larry Merchant after the fight. Classy. If boxing had any integrity, they'd invalidate the results of this fight and make them do it over. Oh yeah, boxing . . . integrity . . . what was I thinking?

So how's that Day of Rage workin' out for ya?

It would seem the great occupation of the hated Wall Street by freedom loving anarchists has been less than successful. By all accounts, instead of the hoped for 20,000 protestors the group seems more likely numbered at around 200.

The NYPD effectively blocked off Wall Street long before the protestors began arriving and used a conspicuous display of polite force to imply that no shenanegans would be tolerated.

The hipster doofus anarchist movement always makes me laugh. I don't have anything against being fired up for you principles. We should all be motivated to take a hand in our own governing. But have some idea what you support and/or oppose, ya know?

These guys are all over the place:

"Shall we demand that President Obama reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act; outlaw flash trading; impose a 1% tax on all financial transactions?"

"We could demand Obama set up an American Democracy Reform Commission tasked with ending the monied corruption in Washington? Or perhaps a Presidential Commission to rethink the American banking system?"

Really?! You're railing against what you consider organized financial improprieties, and your solution is more government interference? Been watching much tv there dude? How's that big government thing working out so far?

But on and on they go throwing everything against the wall in the hopes that something sticks that they can hang their hat on. Though on some level they seem to realize that nothing's really going to happen:

"A reform project like this requires a constitutional amendment that would take a few years and a whole movement to achieve."

Damn that pesky government. If only we could do away with it, right? Kinda sounds like our current President in a way -- "If I could only go around Congress somehow, you know?"

There's a quote from their occupy Wall Street website that cracks me up on a couple of levels:

"Be prepared. We need to be a mobile force. A modern army of nonviolent protest. They will bring tear gas, riot shields, undercovers, and rubber bullets. I’m sure they’ll have choppers a waiting too."

Every see V for Vendetta? Doesn't that sound a bit like the penultimate showdown in the underground railway? Where V reminds the chancellor's tough that they don't have guns, they have bullets . . . and the hopes that when they've fired them all, he's not still standing.

I mean, when you have to crib your cool sounding rhetoric from a movie, maybe you just don't have any original ideas of your own.

There's another part where they refer to themselves as "legion." In the objective, not "a legion" but simply "legion."

That phrasing gets thrown around a lot these days, but plenty don't really know where it comes from. In the Bible, in the book of Mark, Jesus and the disciples take a boat to Gadarenes. Upon disembarking they are approached by a man possessed by Satan.

When Jesus asks the man's name, he replies "My name is Legion; for we are many."

Now the last way you're going to earn my sympathies as an activist, is to start acting as though Satan has all the cool phrases and stuff.

Look, I like horror movies, I like Black Sabbath and BOC, but I still understand that the devil isn't the one to emulate in life. And that's kind of where I really wonder about these guys. They all want the government or the financial sector to collapse. Well then, who runs things when these entities collapse?

The guys with the guns or the clout to be the most powerful would end up in charge. It's a pity these so-called intelligent protestors don't know any history. Do they really want to go back to the days of barons and serfs? Of monarchs? Of a societal schematic that resembles a pea on a flat board?

The weakest, frailest amoung us can take the richest person in the country to court. We have rights that cannot be denied. The system is twisted, there is no doubt of that, but it is still in place and can work if we try.

And the alternative would be a chaotic mess. Pity these guys are all show and no go. At least in the 60s, protestors had an idea of what they wanted to replace the government they so despised. But back then, the protestors were all from colleges where they actually learned something, not just sit around whining and get grades for showing up.

Rule 5 Sunday -- Pamela Anderson

pamela anderson

This week's Rule 5 submission is Pam Anderson.

These celeb bloggers always find the most unflattering candids of Pam and photoshop the crap out of them to exaggerate every wrinkle and blemish so they can ply their trade of snark. But considering the fairly hardcore life she's led -- she looks pretty good for 44.

I always thought that Barb Wire was the perfect role for her as an actress. No one else had that straight from the comic book look down, and for how the movie was written, I thought she did an admirable job in it. The one scene where she's crouched down shooting with the two Desert Eagles -- a great iconic image.

She's more of a look than anything now. I personally would like to see her soften her image a bit -- the extreme eye make-up isn't working sweetheart -- but maybe she thinks she still has to bring it hard for every appearance.

Anyway, here's some older Playboy stuff to remind that there's some serious beauty under all that eye shadow.

click on the thumbnail for full-sized image




Rule 5 Sunday suggested by this.